Categories: Science

Climate reporting standards insufficient, must be expanded, say experts


A new paper from the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford concludes that current climate standards are not sufficiently incentivising the big picture innovations necessary to deliver net zero, and must be expanded to include a company’s broader influence on climate action. The peer-reviewed research, published in Carbon Management, comes after a period of fierce public debate about climate standards and offers possible solutions for those seeking to improve both integrity and impact of corporate climate action.

Incentivising climate action and innovation in the corporate world is essential says co-author Dr Matilda Becker: “Of the 2000 largest companies, close to half still do not yet have a net zero target, while some are going further without reward. We need to incentivise companies’ efforts beyond their boundaries.”

The authors discuss actions that companies can take to accelerate the global transition to net zero across three spheres of influence: product power, purchasing power and political power, and propose an additional reporting track to capture their impact in these areas. This track would demonstrate a company’s wider contribution to global net zero, and examples could include lobbying for cleaner energy systems or signalling financial support for new net zero technologies.

To date, corporate climate standards have been created primarily to guide companies in setting targets (e.g. through the Science Based Targets initiative) and to help them track their own emissions resulting from their activities (e.g. using the Greenhouse Gas Protocol). While these standards have been essential for reducing the emissions of individual companies, say the authors, they fail to incentivise broader climate action and can even discourage it.

“It is essential that companies report and reduce emissions across their value chains,” says co-author Claire Wigg, Head of Climate Performance Practice at the Exponential Roadmap Initiative. “But it is also essential that they drive — and are rewarded for driving — systemic change via the products they produce, the purchases they make and the policies they lobby for or against.”

“The way standards are currently set up, a high-growth renewable energy company might fare poorly because of the emissions generated in making turbines and solar panels, despite the fact these products can help to reduce emissions globally,” explains lead author Kaya Axelsson, Research Fellow and Head of Policy and Partnerships at the Smith School. “We need a way to compare and reward companies that are changing the world, not just their operations.”



Source link

24timenews.com

Recent Posts

MakeMyTrip Collaborates with Ministry of Tourism for Guided Tours, ETTravelWorld

MakeMyTrip has partnered with the Ministry of Tourism to encourage Indian travellers to discover the…

4 hours ago

Genesis’ New Flagship SUV Will Be Big And Powerful

Leaked technical documents allegedly reveal the specs for the Genesis GV90 electric SUV.  The GV90…

5 hours ago

Immune cells flood into the aging brain, Stanford scientists discover

For decades, scientists have generally viewed the brain's immune system as largely separate from the…

5 hours ago

Microsoft Merges Copilot Apps as Features Disappear Starting Aug. 18

Microsoft is collapsing its consumer Copilot and Microsoft 365 Copilot apps into one experience as…

5 hours ago

Emirates SkyCargo transports Orbitworks’ Altair-1 | News

Emirates SkyCargo has completed the transport of Altair-1, the UAE’s first commercial AI-enabled earth observation…

14 hours ago

Mercedes Thinks The V8 Engine Will Be Around For Another Decade

Mercedes-Benz's head of product management thinks the V8 will be around for 10 more years.…

15 hours ago